view
Answer to Case of the Week: Feb 16-Feb 23, 2010

You are shown two chest radiographs separated by a 6-month time frame on this middle-aged man with a history of cough and tobacco abuse.

What are the radiographic findings present? What has transpired between the 2 chest exams? What is your leading diagnosis?





Differential Diagnosis

Unilateral Opaque Thorax

  • Pleural effusion
  • Fibrothorax
  • Primary and secondary pleural malignancy
  • Pneumonia
  • Atelectasis
  • Tuberculosis
  • Pulmonary agenesis or hypoplasia
  • Pneumonectomy
  • Diaphragmatic hernia
  • Chest wall deformity
  • Thoracic spine scoliosis

The differential diagnosis can be further narrowed by noting the relative position of the trachea air column and mediastinum relative to the opaque thorax as follows:

Unilateral Opaque Thorax with Midline Trachea

  • Extensive parenchymal consolidation
  • Malignant pleural disease (e.g., malignant mesothelioma)

Unilateral Opaque Thorax with Contralateral Tracheal Displacement

  • Massive hydrothorax of various etiologies
  • Diaphragmatic hernia
  • Other pleural space occupying masses

Unilateral Opaque Thorax with Ipsilateral Tracheal Displacement

  • Central obstructing tumor with post-obstructive lung collapse
  • Uncomplicated lung collapse (e.g., obstructing foreign body, mucus plug)
  • Following pneumonectomy
  • Pulmonary agenesis or hypoplasia

Discussion

Background

The baseline chest radiographs (Fig. 1A and 1B) revealed a well-defined cavitary mass with eccentric wall thickening. As a general rule, the more irregular or thickened the wall of a cavitary lesion becomes, the more likely the lesion is malignant. The most common cavitary neoplasm in the lung is squamous cell carcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma is also the most common lung neoplasm to present as a central obstructing lesion, followed by small cell carcinoma. Over the 6 months between the 2 studies, the tumor progressed until there was complete obstruction of the main-stem bronchus and resultant post-obstructive collapse of the left lung (Fig. 2 and 3).

Treatment

  • The tumor was non-resectable in this particular case
  • Laser therapy partially restored some patency to the left upper lobe
  • Palliative radiation and chemotherapy

Caveats:

  • The more irregular or thickened the wall of a cavitary lesion becomes, the more likely the lesion is malignant.
  • The broad differential diagnosis for a unilateral opaque thorax can be further narrowed by noting the relative position of the trachea air column and mediastinum relative to the opaque thorax.
  • Squamous cell accounts for 25-40% of all lung cancers; usually develops in proximal airways (centrally); the most likely cell type to cavitate; and the cell type least likely to metastasize distantly

Selected Readings

Lange S, Walsh G.  Radiology of Chest Diseases.  Radiographic Signs and Differential Diagnosis. In: Radiology of Chest Diseases. New York, NY: Thieme Scientific and Medical Publishers, 2007:301-304.

Residents Submitting Correct Diagnosis - Case of the Week
Radiology
Medicine/Pulmonary
VCU Resident
  • Jeremy Camden
  • Keith Goulet
  • Jared Shipley
    Others
  • Wael NemattallaEgypt
  • Gitanjali BajajIndia
  • Shashidharreddy EtikaalaIndia
  • Oleg OpshaUnited States of America
  • Matthew ChaneyUnited States of America
  • Faisal ShadabIndia
  • Monika BagadeIndia
  • Manoj JohnIndia
  • Naganathan ManiUnited States of America
  • Shanaree MuzinichUnited States of America
  • Robert PalmerUnited States of America
  • Abirami MahadevanIndia
  • Abraham SokolPanama
  • John KirkhamUnited States of America
  • Clint JokerstUnited States of America
  • Anup GuptaIndia
  • Jaime BravoPanama
  • Durab KhanUnited Kingdom
  • Mufudzi MavikiZimbabwe
  • Yutthaphan WannasophaThailand
  • Vijay AroraIndia
  • Gita KarandeIndia
  • Prajakta SukhadeveIndia
  • Md FaizanIndia
  • Eisha TahirPakistan
  • Hirennappa UdnurIndia
  • Archana LaroiaUnited States of America

    Disclaimer: This information is intended solely for resident review of presented cases which may or may not be pathologically proven. Information is derived from a number of published sources of varying reliability and does not represent original research from the institution. It is not intended to be comprehensive and should therefore not substitute for careful review of the literature.